saeed attar; elham rasooli sani abadi; masoumeh jargeh
Abstract
Nuclear Dispute of Iran and Countries 5+1 has been one of the most challenging issues in Iran's domestic and foreign policy over the past decade. Using descriptive-analytical method, the purpose of this article is to study of nuclear dispute of Iran and countries 5+1 in the period of 2005- 20015 based ...
Read More
Nuclear Dispute of Iran and Countries 5+1 has been one of the most challenging issues in Iran's domestic and foreign policy over the past decade. Using descriptive-analytical method, the purpose of this article is to study of nuclear dispute of Iran and countries 5+1 in the period of 2005- 20015 based on the game theory. The findings of the paper show that two sides of the dispute used the war of extinction game and the edge of the abyss game as conflict games from 2005 to 2011. These games were based on non-cooperation. Due to the failure to achieve goals and becoming more difficult the continuation of these games for players, two sides of the dispute went to the bargain game and prisoner's dilemma game. Also depending on the type of each game at each stage, the time of negotiation rounds was determined so the time of negotiation rounds decreased dramatically.
